That bastion of yellow liberal journalism known as the Charleston City Paper has jumped in to ride Glenn Smith's coat tails. While Glenn gave us a fair shake, the slant of the CCP is well known to all local residents. If they didn't hand that rag out for free it would be stacked to the ceiling at the publisher.
We are amazed at how quickly these liberal race hustlers are to assume most of the folks who have voluntarily represented themselves as drug dealers and gangsters, and posted the pictures to prove it, are simply "posers". Well, CCP, there is that little concept commonly known as 'evidence'. They posted it, we found it on a public forum and distributed it over a wider public forum. Why don't you wander in to a local P.D. with some of those pictures. They already know who these people are.
Not all of the folks featured here are unknown to us. We live in these communities and we know who and where the problems are. We have also developed a small force of anonymous citizens who forward information on the problems in their communities.
South of Broad cokeheads, College of Charleston potheads and the other folks pointed out in this hit piece don't advertise and don't post pictures of themselves with a straw in their nose, a few grand in their teeth and an AK in their hands. Reality sucks doesn't it? You don't think we would slam a similar photo of that Ravenel clown up on the site if there was one on his Facebook page? You are sadly mistaken.
Just because you folks publish a 'newspaper' doesn't necessarily mean your reading comprehension is up to par. Let us assist you:
That is called a definition. Read it a few times.
Now follow along with our hypothetical here. Let's say we gallop over to the CCP Facebook page and the "about us" section states:
"Slingin' the news and stackin' the advertising bands even though we forged our journalism degrees."
Then we find pictures of you actually forging those degrees.
We decide to take a screen capture of the evidence YOU put up there and post it in the blogosphere.
Have we published a libel against you or simply exposed your confession to a wider audience? Based on your article we can guess your answer, so we should ask an impartial party.
What about it citizens? Is that a libel or would we simply be assisting the CCP in their obvious desire to put their self-professed forgery business all over the internet?
You also err in assuming a private setting on a social media site would prevent us from pulling these thugs out of the woodwork. Remember those anonymous citizens we mentioned earlier? Yeah. Pissed off citizens can be sneaky like that.